Works matching Judiciary Act of 1789
1
- Arizona Law Review, 2013, v. 55, n. 4, p. 909
- Article
3
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1859
- Article
4
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 699
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 557
- Article
6
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2018, v. 65, n. 1, p. 97, doi. 10.1353/dss.2018.0008
- Article
7
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 1, p. 293
- Article
8
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 2, p. 541
- Article
9
- Syracuse Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 3, p. 551
- Article
10
- Tulane Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 5/6, p. 1019
- Article
11
- University of Miami Law Review, 2015, v. 69, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
12
- Family Law Quarterly, 2018, v. 52, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
13
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2018, v. 66, p. 153, doi. 10.1093/ajcl/avy023
- Article
14
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2014, v. 18, n. 3, p. 673
- Article
16
- Virginia Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 56, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
17
- Loyola Maritime Law Journal, 2013, v. 12, p. 73
- Article
18
- Pace Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
19
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 3, p. 609
- Bellia Jr., Anthony J.;
- Clark, Bradford R.
- Article
20
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2016, v. 84, p. 95
- Article
21
- North East Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, v. 32, p. 157
- Article
22
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2016, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
23
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2018, v. 108, n. 2, p. 253
- ZYDNEY MANNHEIMER, MICHAEL J.
- Article
24
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 3, p. 611
- Article
25
- Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 2018, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
26
- Villanova Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
27
- Judicature, 2025, v. 108, n. 3, p. 88
- Article
28
- Tulane Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
29
- University of Miami Law Review, 2017, v. 72, n. 1, p. 176
- Article
30
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
31
- UCLA Law Review, 2018, v. 65, n. 1, p. 170
- Article
32
- Virginia Law Review, 2017, v. 103, n. 5, p. 805
- Article
33
- Journal of Southern Legal History, 2017, v. 25, p. 235
- Article
34
- Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce, 2014, v. 41, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
35
- Právník, 2013, v. 152, n. 7, p. 677
- Article
36
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1794
- Article
37
- Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Sarajevu, 2013, v. 56, p. 29
- Article
38
- Touro Law Review, 2022, v. 38, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
39
- California Law Review, 1945, v. 33, n. 2, p. 230, doi. 10.2307/3477336
- Article
40
- California Law Review, 1925, v. 13, n. 4, p. 314
- Article
41
- Brookings Review, 1992, v. 10, n. 1, p. 34
- Article
42
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1971, v. 62, n. 2, p. 194, doi. 10.2307/1141877
- Article
43
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2014, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5235/20414005.5.1.1
- Article
44
- Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2011, v. 29, n. 2, p. 456
- Drimmer, Jonathan C.;
- Lamoree, Sarah R.
- Article
45
- Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2009, v. 27, n. 2, p. 316
- Article
46
- Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 2008, v. 39, n. 2, p. 157
- Article
47
- American University International Law Review, 2018, v. 33, n. 4, p. 693
- KECK, THOMAS M.;
- METROKA, BRANDON T.;
- PRICE, RICHARD S.
- Article
48
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2003, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/1540-5818.00052
- Article
49
- Columbia Law Review, 2006, v. 106, n. 4, p. 830
- Article
50
- Columbia Law Review, 2004, v. 104, n. 7, p. 1765, doi. 10.2307/4099335
- Article