Works matching Interpretation %26 construction of American law
2
- Yale Law Journal, 2013, v. 123, n. 2, p. 266
- Article
5
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 122, n. 1, p. 70
- Article
6
- Yale Law Journal, 2011, v. 121, n. 3, p. 534
- Article
7
- Yale Law Journal, 2009, v. 119, n. 2, p. 140
- Article
8
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 363
- Article
10
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 3, p. 1341
- Article
11
- Villanova Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 3, p. 515
- Article
12
- University of Miami Law Review, 2013, v. 67, n. 2, p. 397
- Article
13
- University of Miami Law Review, 2012, v. 67, n. 1, p. 148
- Article
14
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1522
- Article
15
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 2, p. 652
- Article
16
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 51
- CHOI, ALBERT;
- TRIANTIS, GEORGE
- Article
17
- New York University Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 6, p. 2118
- LAW, DAVID S.;
- VERSTEEG, MILA
- Article
18
- Natural Resources Journal, 2014, v. 54, n. 1, p. 1
- BLUMM, MICHAEL C.;
- HALL, MAGGIE
- Article
19
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2008, v. 17, n. 3, p. 505
- Article
20
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 73, n. 2, p. 635
- Article
21
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 73, n. 2, p. 458
- Article
24
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
26
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 60
- Article
27
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 3, p. 727
- Sullivan, Edward J.;
- Bragar, Jennifer
- Article
28
- Duke Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 7, p. 1214
- BRADLEY, CURTIS A.;
- SIEGEL, NEIL S.
- Article
29
- Duke Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 8, p. 1673
- Article
31
- Duke Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 2, p. 347
- Article
33
- Columbia Law Review, 2014, v. 114, n. 4, p. 807
- Article
34
- 2013
- Eskridge, Jr., William N.
- Book Review
36
- Banking Law Journal, 2014, v. 131, n. 1, p. 126
- JENSEN, KIRK D.;
- REDDING, JOHN C.;
- LEONHARDT, SASHA
- Article
37
- 2014
- Zashin, Andrew A.;
- Reynolds, Christopher R.;
- Keating, Amy M.
- Case Study
38
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2014, v. 47, p. 77
- Article
39
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2014, v. 47, p. 55
- Missirian, David;
- Alexander, Mystica
- Article
40
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2014, v. 47, p. 33
- Article
41
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 5, p. 1023
- Woolhandler, Ann;
- Collins, Michael G.
- Article
42
- 2013
- Daily, James E.;
- Scott Kieff, F.
- Essay
43
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2011, v. 10, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
44
- Syracuse Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
45
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2012, v. 68, n. 2, p. 397
- Article
46
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 4, p. 977
- Article
47
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1053
- Article
48
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 917
- Article
49
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2021, v. 82, n. 2, p. 249
- Article
50
- Law & History Review, 2014, v. 32, n. 3, p. b1, doi. 10.1017/S0738248014000285
- Article