Works matching Insanity defense and the Supreme Court

Results: 16

US Supreme Court Denies Review of Idaho's Abolition of Insanity Defense; Three Justices Dissent.

Published in:: Developments in Mental Health Law, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 12
Publication type:: Article

KAHLER V. KANSAS: HOW THE CURRENT INSANITY DEFENSE REGIME UNDERSERVES POSTPARTUM PSYCHOSIS DEFENDANTS, HOW THE SUPREME COURT FAILED TO ACT, AND HOW NOW IS THE PERFECT TIME TO IMPLEMENT A GENDER-SPECIFIC POSTPARTUM DEFENSE.

Published in:

St. Mary's Law Journal, 2023, v. 54, n. 1, p. 265

By:

FRAZIER, VICTORIA

Publication type:

Article

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S ENDURING MISUNDERSTANDING OF INSANITY.

Published in:

New Mexico Law Review, 2022, v. 52, n. 1, p. 34

By:

DeMatteo, David;
Krauss, Daniel A.;
Fishel, Sarah;
Wiltsie, Kellie

Publication type:

Article

INSANE: JAMES HOLMES, CLARK V. ARIZONA, AND AMERICA'S INSANITY DEFENSE.

Published in:

Journal of Law & Health, 2018, v. 31, n. 1, p. 33

By:

COLLINS, ERIC

Publication type:

Article

The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.

Published in:

Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2003, v. 21, n. 2, p. 135, doi. 10.1002/bsl.527

By:

Litwack, Thomas R.

Publication type:

Article

KAHLER V. KANSAS: A DEFENSE DENIED.

Published in:

Denver Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 4, p. 867

By:

Poché, Elizabeth

Publication type:

Article

DEVELOPMENTS IN MENTAL HEALTH LAW.

Published in:

Developments in Mental Health Law, 2013, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1

By:

Hickey, Jane D.;
Strickler Jr., Edward

Publication type:

Article

Insanity Defense: Past, Present, and Future.

Published in:

Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 2015, v. 37, n. 4, p. 381, doi. 10.4103/0253-7176.168559

By:

Math, Suresh Bada;
Kumar, Channaveerachari Naveen;
Moirangthem, Sydney

Publication type:

Article

PULLING ON THE THREAD OF THE INSANITY DEFENSE.

Published in:

Villanova Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 1, p. 221

By:

WRIGHT, R. GEORGE

Publication type:

Article

Substantive Crimes.

Published in:

California Law Review, 1967, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1123

By:

Babcock Jr., Bruce;
Beck, Jeffrey F.;
Bethard, William S.;
Hall, Richard V.;
Huerta, John E.;
Patrick, Clayton C.;
Schwab, Douglas M.

Publication type:

Article

'Give me a break! I couldn't help myself!'?: Rejecting volitional impairment as a basis for departure under federal sentencing guidelines section 5K2.13.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1999, v. 147, n. 3, p. 729, doi. 10.2307/3312721

By:

Pelayo, Carlos M.

Publication type:

Article

OVERWORKING THE PRESUMPTION OF SANITY: CLARK'S USE OF MENTAL DISEASE EVIDENCE TO NEGATE MENS REA.

Published in:

UCLA Law Review, 2007, v. 55, n. 2, p. 467

By:

Berman, Jordan

Publication type:

Article

Mens Rea and Insanity Defense under U.S. Law -- An Analysis of Clark v. Arizona.

Published in:

EurAmerica, 2009, v. 39, n. 4, p. 615

By:

Chih-Chieh Lin

Publication type:

Article

SHATTERED BRAINS IN SHACKLES: THE FUTURE OF MENTALLY ILL DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING KAHLER V. KANSAS.

Published in:

Indiana Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 4, p. 831

By:

PRICE, HANNAH

Publication type:

Article

Reshaping Insanity in Pakistani Law: The Case of Safia Bano.

Published in:

American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2023, v. 49, n. 2/3, p. 301, doi. 10.1017/amj.2023.33

By:

Munir, Muhammad Ahmad;
Wright, Brian

Publication type:

Article

Criminal Law-Right to Insanity Defense.

Published in:: American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1991, v. 17, n. 1/2, p. 192
Publication type:: Article