Works matching Immigration law and the Supreme Court
1
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 1, p. 215
- Rodriguez, Kate Aschenbrenner
- Article
2
- UMKC Law Review, 2019, v. 87, n. 3, p. 549
- Article
3
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
4
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 156
- Article
5
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2000, v. 2000, n. 4, p. 1551
- Article
6
- Revista Juridicas, 2022, v. 19, n. 1, p. 263, doi. 10.17151/jurid.2022.19.1.15
- Article
7
- California Legal History, 2015, v. 10, p. 238
- Article
8
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2021, v. 52, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
9
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 2, p. 231
- Article
10
- Texas Law Review, 2001, v. 79, n. 4, p. 813
- Article
11
- Hinckley Journal of Politics, 2013, v. 14, p. 41
- Article
12
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
13
- New York Law School Law Review, 2005, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1145
- Article
14
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 199
- Article
15
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2012, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1041
- Johnson, Kevin R.;
- Salinas, Serena Faye
- Article
16
- Latin American Law Review, 2020, n. 5, p. 159, doi. 10.29263/lar05.2020.08
- Article
17
- Columbia Journal of Race & Law, 2015, v. 5, n. 2, p. 119
- Article
20
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
21
- Georgia Historical Quarterly, 2023, v. 107, n. 4, p. 391
- Article
22
- Wisconsin International Law Journal, 2024, v. 41, n. 2, p. 187, doi. 10.59015/wilj.XRRS5261
- Article
23
- Wisconsin International Law Journal, 2024, v. 41, n. 2, p. 187
- Article
24
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
25
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 8, p. 1
- Article
26
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2011, v. 36, n. 1, p. 269
- Article
27
- Tulane Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
28
- Journal of Civil Rights & Economic Development, 2014, v. 27, n. 3, p. 441
- Article
29
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 9, n. 2, p. 529
- Article
30
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 5, p. 703
- Article
31
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2013, v. 80, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
32
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 2074
- GULASEKARAM, PRATHEEPAN;
- RAMAKRISHNAN, S. KARTHICK
- Article
33
- Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2012, v. 13, n. 3, p. 161, doi. 10.2304/ciec.2012.13.3.161
- Article
34
- Family Law Quarterly, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
35
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 3, p. 723
- Abebe, Daniel;
- Huq, Aziz Z.
- Article
36
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2014, v. 17, n. 4, p. 881
- Article
37
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2015, v. 26, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
38
- Yale Law Journal, 2024, v. 134, n. 2, p. 329
- Article
39
- Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 2017, v. 21, p. 27, doi. 10.12775/SIT.2017.025
- Article
40
- Indiana Law Journal, 2022, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1455
- Article
41
- Denver Law Review, 2023, v. 100, n. 3, p. 773
- Article
42
- International Social Science Review, 2021, v. 97, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
43
- International Journal of Discrimination & the Law, 2023, v. 23, n. 4, p. 321, doi. 10.1177/13582291231199370
- Article
44
- Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2012, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
45
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2022, v. 79, n. 5, p. 12
- Article
46
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 7, p. 43
- Article
47
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 6, p. 43
- Article
48
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2014, v. 71, n. 5, p. 48
- Article
49
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
50
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 305
- Article