Works matching IS 28321189 AND DT 2024 AND VI 28 AND IP 1
Results: 6
WITHDRAWING LANHAM ACT SECTION 2(C) CONSENT: WHAT SHOULD COURTS DO?
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 91
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE EFFECTS OF SECTION 101'S SUBJECT MATTER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT ON FINTECH PATENT VALUATION MODELS.
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
LOOKING FOR LIABILITY FOR HARMFUL SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT AND CYBERBULLYING AFTER GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE, LLC.
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 17
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
KEEPING IT WREAL: HOW THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'S WREAL DECISION IS BETTER SUITED FOR A UNIFORM REVERSE CONFUSION MULTIFACTOR ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 77
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INNOVATOR ECOSYSTEM DIVERSITY AS A GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS IMPERATIVE.
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A QUESTIONABLE CATEGORIZATION--TRADEMARK'S STRUGGLE TO PROTECT TRIBAL CULTURAL PROPERTY.
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article