Best Practices in the Application of the Ranked Discrepancy Model.
- Published in:
- Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2024, v. 5, n. 4, p. 53, doi. 10.37433/aad.v5i4.559
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 26905078 AND DT 2024 AND VI 5 AND IP 4
Results: 6
1
2
Enhancing Effectiveness of Extension Program Evaluations by Validating the Trustworthiness of Self-Reported Measures of Extension Program Outcomes.
- Published in:
- Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2024, v. 5, n. 4, p. 59, doi. 10.37433/aad.v5i4.519
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Entering the Agricultural Education Professorate: Hiring Authorities' Perceptions of Tenure-Track Faculty Needs.
- Published in:
- Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2024, v. 5, n. 4, p. 14, doi. 10.37433/aad.v5i4.517
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
A Discrepancy in Discrepancy Scores? Comparing the Borich and Ranked Discrepancy Models for Determining Professional Development Needs.
- Published in:
- Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2024, v. 5, n. 4, p. 42, doi. 10.37433/aad.v5i4.515
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Inservice Needs of Selected Arkansas Agriculture Teachers Related to Precision Agriculture.
- Published in:
- Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2024, v. 5, n. 4, p. 28, doi. 10.37433/aad.v5i4.509
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Determining Collaboration Between University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension Agents and Secondary School-Based Agricultural Educators.
- Published in:
- Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2024, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1, doi. 10.37433/aad.v5i4.469
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article