Two Decades of Research Assessment in Italy. Addressing the Criticisms.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.28
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 26895870 AND DT 2020 AND VI 2 AND IP 1
Results: 17
1
2
Two Decades of Experience in Research Assessment in Italy.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.27
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
A Defense of Moderate Language Pluralism in Scholarly Production in the Humanities.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.25
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Quantification - Affordances and Limits.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Measuring Open Access Uptake: Data Sources, Expectations, and Misconceptions.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Studying Bibliometrics-Based Heuristics (BBHs): A New Research Program on the use of Bibliometrics in Research Evaluation.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Do Online Readerships Offer Useful Assessment Tools? Discussion Around the Practical Applications of Mendeley Readership for Scholarly Assessment.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.20
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Ethical Theories in Research Evaluation: An Exploratory Approach.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.19
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
How Evaluative Informetrics Relates to Scientific, Socio-Historical, Political, Ethical and Personal Values.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Bibliometrically Disciplined Peer Review: on Using Indicators in Research Evaluation.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.15
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Why Books are Important in the Scholarly Communication System in Social Sciences and Humanities.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.14
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Assessing the Impact and Quality of Research Data Using Altmetrics and Other Indicators.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Mobility Patterns of Top Israeli Researchers.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.12
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Critical Assessment of Technological Development: What Can Bibliometrics Reveal?
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
The Pros and Cons of the Use of Altmetrics in Research Assessment.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Appropriate Use of Metrics in Research Assessment of Autonomous Academic Institutions.
- Published in:
- Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2020, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.29024/sar.8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article