Works matching IS 24724807 AND DT 2020 AND VI 46 AND IP 3

Results: 11

TORTS: JUST WALK AWAY: HOW AN OVERBROAD FORESEEABILITY OF HARM STANDARD COULD KILL "CURBSIDE CONSULTATIONS" -- WARREN V. DINTER, 926 N.W.2D 370 (MINN. 2019).

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 689

By:

Miller, Erika E.

Publication type:

Article

SHAPING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS THROUGH HUMAN RIGHTS ADJUDICATION: THE EXAMPLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 527

By:

Geiger, Christophe;
Izyumenko, Elena

Publication type:

Article

PROPERTY: RIGHT OUTCOME, WRONG REASON--GILL V. GILL, 919 N.W.2D 297 (MINN. 2018).

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 844

By:

Cicotte, Wendy

Publication type:

Article

MORE "SUBSTANTIAL HARM" THAN GOOD: RECRAFTING FOIA'S EXEMPTION 4 AFTER FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE V. ARGUS LEADER MEDIA.

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 497

By:

Kirtley, Jane E.;
Memmel, Scott;
Anderson, Jonathan

Publication type:

Article

MINOR ADVANCES, MAJOR CONSEQUENCES: HATCH-WAXMAN ADMINISTERS EXCLUSIVITY FOR DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES.

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 655

By:

Stemler, Taylor

Publication type:

Article

HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS AND AUTHORSHIP NORMS.

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 478

By:

Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal

Publication type:

Article

CRIMINAL LAW: THE DANGERS OF INCOMPLETE STATUTORY INTERPRETATION AND THE UNFORTUNATE EQUAL PROTECTION IMPLICATIONS THAT FOLLOW -- HEILMAN V. COURTNEY, 926 N.W.2D 387 (MINN. 2019).

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 808

By:

Gutknecht, Claire

Publication type:

Article

COPYRIGHT AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE BALLROOM: A MINUET BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EU.

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 613

By:

Montagnani, Maria Lillà;
Trapova, Alina

Publication type:

Article

CONTRACTS: AN EIGHT-FACTOR TEST FOR QUANTUM MERUIT COMPENSATION FOR A DISMISSED CONTINGENCY FEE COUNSEL-- FARICY LAW FIRM, P.A. V. API, INC. ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST, 912 N.W.2D 652 (MINN. 2018).

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 774

By:

Ohiwa, Mitch

Publication type:

Article

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: COURTS SHOULD NOT FORFEIT THE BARKER FACTORS IN CIVIL FORFEITURE--OLSON V. ONE 1999 LEXUS MN LICENSE PLATE NO. 851LDV VIN: JT6HF10U6X0079461, 924 N.W.2D 594 (MINN. 2019).

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 730

By:

Simunic, Kathryn

Publication type:

Article

CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE COURT STEPPING INTO EDUCATION--CRUZ-GUZMAN V. STATE, 916 N.W.2D 1 (MINN. 2018).

Published in:

Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 3, p. 886

By:

Richie, Morgan

Publication type:

Article