CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL LANGUAGE PROTECTION IN MULTILINGUAL STATES: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF SOUTH AFRICA AND BELGIUM.
- Published in:
- Erasmus Law Review, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 211, doi. 10.5553/elr221026712012005003006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 22102671 AND DT 2012 AND VI 5 AND IP 3
Results: 6
1
2
ENGLISH AS A COURT LANGUAGE IN CONTINENTAL COURTS.
- Published in:
- Erasmus Law Review, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 187, doi. 10.5553/elr221026712012005003005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
TACKLING LANGUAGE OBSTACLES IN CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION: THE EUROPEAN ORDER FOR PAYMENT AND THE EUROPEAN SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Erasmus Law Review, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 169, doi. 10.5553/elr221026712012005003004
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
PRACTICAL OBSTACLES IN CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION AND COMMUNICATION BETWEEN (EU) COURTS.
- Published in:
- Erasmus Law Review, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 151, doi. 10.5553/elr221026712012005003003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
EUROPE, APORETICALLY: A COMMON LAW WITHOUT A COMMON DISCOURSE.
- Published in:
- Erasmus Law Review, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 135, doi. 10.5553/elr221026712012005003002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
INTRODUCTION: LAW AND LANGUAGE; IMPLICATIONS FOR HARMONISATION AND CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- Erasmus Law Review, 2012, v. 5, n. 3, p. 133, doi. 10.5553/elr221026712012005003001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article