CONCERNING THE JAPANESE PUBLIC'S EVALUATION OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1769
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 21667993 AND DT 2011 AND VI 88 AND IP 6
Results: 17
1
2
JUDICIAL RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION: RESPONSES TO PROFESSORS RAMSEYER AND REPETA.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
3
THE SUPREME COURT AND THE PUSH FOR TRANSPARENCY IN LOWER COURT APPOINTMENTS IN JAPAN.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
4
LOOKING THROUGH THE WRONG END OF THE TELESCOPE: THE JAPANESE JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO STEEL PARTNERS, MURAKAMI, AND HORIE.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1571
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS AND THE JAPANESE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1559
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
THE SUPREME COURT OF JAPAN: COMMENTARY ON THE RECENT WORK OF SCHOLARS IN THE UNITED STATES.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
7
RESERVED SEATS ON JAPAN'S SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1713
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
THE JAPANESE CONSTITUTION AS LAW AND THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SUPREME COURT'S CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS: A RESPONSE TO MATSUI.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1527
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
DO SCHOOL CLIQUES DOMINATE JAPANESE BUREAUCRACIES?: EVIDENCE FROM SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENTS.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1681
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENTS IN JAPAN: A COMMENT ON THE ROLE OF PRECEDENT.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
11
THE ROLE OF PRECEDENT AT JAPAN'S SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1631
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
"CHŌSAKAN": RESEARCH JUDGES TOILING AT THE STONE FORTRESS.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1601
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION IN JAPAN: CONTEXT, STRUCTURES, AND VALUES.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1467
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
STEALTH ACTIVISM: NORM FORMATION BY JAPANESE COURTS.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1493
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
WHY HAS JUDICIAL REVIEW FAILED IN JAPAN?
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1425
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
WHY IS THE JAPANESE SUPREME COURT SO CONSERVATIVE?
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1375
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
DECISION MAKING ON THE JAPANESE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2011, v. 88, n. 6, p. 1365
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article