Works matching IS 20403585 AND DT 2018 AND VI 9 AND IP 3
Results: 17
Requiem for Crimea: Why Tribunals Should Have Declined Jurisdiction over the Claims of Ukrainian Investors against Russian under the Ukraine–Russia BIT.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 506, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy022
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
When is an Expert not an Expert?
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 352, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Expert Evidence and the Challenge of Procedural Reform in International Dispute Settlement.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 464, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Some Views from the Crucible: The Perspective of an Expert Witness on the Adversarial Principle.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 361, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy008
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Experts before ITLOS: An Overview of the Tribunal’s Practice.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 433, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Parties’ Engagement with Experts in International Litigation.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 440, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
One Size does not Fit All—Uses of Experts before International Courts and Tribunals: An Insight into the Practice.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 477, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Symposium—The Expert in the International Adjudicative ProcessConcluding Observations.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Legal Basis and Procedures for Consulting with Experts and International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 423, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Different Forms of Expert Involvement in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 367, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Experts before the International Court of Justice: What for?
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 345, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Judging ‘Best Available Science’: Emerging Issues and the Role of Experts.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 388, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Assessment of Expert Evidence in International Adjudication.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 401, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Expert Scientific Evidence in a Broader Context.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 379, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Search for Objectivity: The Use of Experts in Philip Morris v Uruguay.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 411, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The Expert in the International Adjudicative Process: Introduction to the Special Issue.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 339, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Experts in Investor-State Arbitration: The Tribunal as Gatekeeper.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2018, v. 9, n. 3, p. 453, doi. 10.1093/jnlids/idy006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article