COCHRAN V. COMMONWEALTH: REVISITING WHETHER KENTUCKY SHOULD CHARGE, COMMIT, OR CURE PREGNANT SUBSTANCE ABUSERS.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 3, p. 551By:Fitzpatrick, ElisabethPublication type:Article
PROTECTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN KENTUCKY: PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS FOR THE USE OF VIDEO EXCERPTS DURING CLOSING ARGUMENTS.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 3, p. 527By:Theiss, James D.Publication type:Article
THINKING BEFORE RULEMAKING: WHY THE SEC SHOULD THINK TWICE BEFORE IMPOSING A UNIFORM FIDUCIARY STANDARD ON BROKER-DEALERS AND INVESTMENT ADVISERS.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 3, p. 491By:Jordan, RossPublication type:Article
RACIALLY TRANSCENDENT DIVERSITY.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 3, p. 415By:Paradise, BrandonPublication type:Article