AN UNREASONABLE SCOPE: THE NEED FOR CLARITY IN FEDERAL RULE 30(b)(6) DEPOSITIONS.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2010, v. 49, n. 1, p. 133By:Crouse, Kelly TenillePublication type:Article
A SOCIAL WORKER'S DILEMMA WHEN A CLIENT HAS A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE: THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE DUTY TO WARN SEXUAL PARTNERS.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2010, v. 49, n. 1, p. 111By:Johnstone, Guion L.Publication type:Article
THE ART OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: IDENTIFYING THE INTERPRETIVE THEORY OF THE JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS' CLAIMS AND THE UNITESTATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2010, v. 49, n. 1, p. 59By:Jellum, Linda D.Publication type:Article
THE GOVERNMENT-SPEECH DOCTRINE: "RECENTLY MINTED;" BUT COUNTERFEIT.Published in:University of Louisville Law Review, 2010, v. 49, n. 1, p. 21By:Goldberg, Steven H.Publication type:Article
THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF THE DISFAVORED.Published in:2010By:Starr, Kenneth W.Publication type:Speech