VIEWING CHILD WITNESSES THROUGH A CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC LENS: HOW ATTORNEYS' ETHICAL DUTIES EXACERBATE CHILDREN'S PSYCHOPATHOLOGY.Published in:Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 2, p. 369By:Patton, William WesleyPublication type:Article
A SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH OR TRIAL BY ORDEAL: WHEN PROSECUTORS CROSS-EXAMINE ADOLESCENTS HOW SHOULD COURTS RESPOND?Published in:Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 2, p. 335By:Vandervort, Frank E.Publication type:Article
DOCUMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF CHILDREN'S FORENSIC INTERVIEW STATEMENTS.Published in:Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 2, p. 305By:Russell, AmyPublication type:Article
THE CHILD DECLARANT, THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, AND THE FORFEITURE DOCTRINE.Published in:Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 2, p. 279By:Fishman, Clifford S.Publication type:Article
DISTRUSTING YOUNG CHILDREN WHO ALLEGE SEXUAL ABUSE: WHY STEREOTYPES DON'T DIE AND WAYS TO FACILITATE CHILD TESTIMONY.Published in:Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 2, p. 239By:Raeder, Myrna S.Publication type:Article
FOREWORD: WHY "THE CHILD WITNESS" NOW?Published in:Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 2, p. 239By:Epstein, JulesPublication type:Article