Works matching IS 17571693 AND DT 2019 AND VI 11 AND IP 11

Results: 10

Issue Information.

Published in:: GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1253, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12654
Publication type:: Article

Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy.

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1256, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12643

By:

Norton, Michael;
Baldi, Andras;
Buda, Vicas;
Carli, Bruno;
Cudlin, Pavel;
Jones, Mike B.;
Korhola, Atte;
Michalski, Rajmund;
Novo, Francisco;
Oszlányi, Július;
Santos, Filpe Duarte;
Schink, Bernhard;
Shepherd, John;
Vet, Louise;
Walloe, Lars;
Wijkman, Anders

Publication type:

Article

Methane yield and species diversity dynamics of perennial wild plant mixtures established alone, under cover crop maize (Zea mays L.), and after spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1376, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12640

By:

Cossel, Moritz;
Steberl, Kathrin;
Hartung, Jens;
Pereira, Lorena A.;
Kiesel, Andreas;
Lewandowski, Iris

Publication type:

Article

Project level assessment of indirect land use changes arising from biofuel production.

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1361, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12638

By:

Di Lucia, Lorenzo;
Sevigné‐Itoiz, Eva;
Peterson, Steve;
Bauen, Ausilio;
Slade, Raphael

Publication type:

Article

How can miscanthus fields be reintegrated into a crop rotation?

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1348, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12636

By:

Mangold, Anja;
Lewandowski, Iris;
Kiesel, Andreas

Publication type:

Article

Nitrogen‐dependent bacterial community shifts in root, rhizome and rhizosphere of nutrient‐efficient Miscanthus x giganteus from long‐term field trials.

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1334, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12634

By:

Liu, Yuan;
Ludewig, Uwe

Publication type:

Article

Saccharum × Miscanthus intergeneric hybrids (miscanes) exhibit greater chilling tolerance of C<sub>4</sub> photosynthesis and postchilling recovery than sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids).

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1318, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12632

By:

Kar, Suraj;
Zhang, Na;
Nakashima, Taiken;
Villanueva‐Morales, Antonio;
Stewart, J. Ryan;
Sacks, Erik J.;
Terajima, Yoshifumi;
Yamada, Toshihiko

Publication type:

Article

Phytolith‐rich biochar: A potential Si fertilizer in desilicated soils.

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1264, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12635

By:

Li, Zimin;
Delvaux, Bruno

Publication type:

Article

Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1283, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12626

By:

Kalt, Gerald;
Mayer, Andreas;
Theurl, Michaela C.;
Lauk, Christian;
Erb, Karl‐Heinz;
Haberl, Helmut

Publication type:

Article

Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) simulated hydrological impacts of land use change from temperate grassland to energy crops: A case study in western UK.

Published in:

GCB Bioenergy, 2019, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1298, doi. 10.1111/gcbb.12628

By:

Holder, Amanda J.;
Rowe, Rebecca;
McNamara, Niall P.;
Donnison, Iain S.;
McCalmont, Jon P.

Publication type:

Article