The Animal Efficacy Rule and public health.
- Published in:
- Research Ethics, 2015, v. 11, n. 2, p. 64, doi. 10.1177/1747016115595558
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 17470161 AND DT 2015 AND VI 11 AND IP 2
Results: 5
1
2
Lay members of New Zealand research ethics committees: Who and what do they represent?
- Published in:
- Research Ethics, 2015, v. 11, n. 2, p. 82, doi. 10.1177/1747016115581723
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Serious but not solemn: Rebalancing the assessment of risks and benefits of patient recruitment materials.
- Published in:
- Research Ethics, 2015, v. 11, n. 2, p. 98, doi. 10.1177/1747016114552338
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
How idiocultures and warrants operate independently in New Zealand health ethics review boards.
- Published in:
- Research Ethics, 2015, v. 11, n. 2, p. 67, doi. 10.1177/1747016114542546
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Using digital archives in historical research: What are the ethical concerns for a ‘forgotten’ individual?
- Published in:
- Research Ethics, 2015, v. 11, n. 2, p. 108, doi. 10.1177/1747016115581724
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article