The Problem of Data Bias in the Pool of Published U.S. Appellate Court Opinions.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 224, doi. 10.1111/jels.12253
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 17401453 AND DT 2020 AND VI 17 AND IP 2
Results: 8
1
2
Subsidizing Liquidity with Wider Ticks: Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Study.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 262, doi. 10.1111/jels.12252
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in Bi‐Dimensional Courts: Evidence from Catalonia.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 383, doi. 10.1111/jels.12251
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Developing High‐Quality Data Infrastructure for Legal Analytics: Introducing the Israeli Supreme Court Database.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 416, doi. 10.1111/jels.12250
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Improving Scientific Judgments in Law and Government: A Field Experiment of Patent Peer Review.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 190, doi. 10.1111/jels.12249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Randomness Pre‐Considered: Recognizing and Accounting for "De‐Randomizing" Events When Utilizing Random Judicial Assignment.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 342, doi. 10.1111/jels.12248
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
How Would Judges Compose Judicial Panels? Theory and Evidence from the Supreme Court of Israel.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 317, doi. 10.1111/jels.12247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Issue Information.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 2, p. 187, doi. 10.1111/jels.12221
- Publication type:
- Article