Found: 24
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
Response to the Letter 'Efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials and how to compensate for it: comment on You et al. (2011)' by van Breukelen and Candel.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
Efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials and how to compensate for it: comment on You et al. (2011)
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
Methods to limit attrition in longitudinal comparative effectiveness trials: lessons from the Lithium Treatment - Moderate dose Use Study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
Transparency in the presentation of trial results may not increase patients' trust in medical researchers.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
A regulator's view of comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
2011 Peer Reviewers.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 132, doi. 10.1177/1740774512436526
- Publication type:
- Article
Quasi-random reflections on randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.1177/1740774511433285
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Panel discussion 2.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1177/1740774511433048
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Panel discussion 1.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.1177/1740774511433047
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Open forum.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1177/1740774511433046
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Proceedings of the University of Pennsylvania annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: statistical issues in comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1177/1740774511433045
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Infusion of statistical science in comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 6, doi. 10.1177/1740774511433044
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Midcourse correction to a clinical trial when the event rate is underestimated: the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) Study.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 113, doi. 10.1177/1740774511432726
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Clinician-trialist rounds: 8. Mentoring – part 2: the structure and function of effective mentoring linkage, resources, and academic opportunities.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 128, doi. 10.1177/1740774511430241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Response to the Letter ‘Efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials and how to compensate for it: comment on You et al. (2011)’ by van Breukelen and Candel.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 126, doi. 10.1177/1740774511429832
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials and how to compensate for it: comment on You et al. (2011).
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 125, doi. 10.1177/1740774511428649
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Factors influencing enrollment of African Americans in the Look AHEAD trial.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 80, doi. 10.1177/1740774511427929
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Methods to limit attrition in longitudinal comparative effectiveness trials: lessons from the Lithium Treatment – Moderate dose Use Study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 94, doi. 10.1177/1740774511427324
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Rationale, challenges, and participants in a Phase II trial of a botanical product for chronic hepatitis C.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 102, doi. 10.1177/1740774511427064
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Transparency in the presentation of trial results may not increase patients’ trust in medical researchers.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 90, doi. 10.1177/1740774511427063
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1177/1740774511427062
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A regulator’s view of comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 56, doi. 10.1177/1740774511422548
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 48, doi. 10.1177/1740774511420743
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Bayesian approaches for comparative effectiveness research.
- Published in:
- Clinical Trials, 2012, v. 9, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1177/1740774511417470
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article