THE EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE EXPRESSED IN "NORMALIZING" SURGERY ON CHILDREN WITH INTERSEX TRAITS.
- Published in:
- Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2020, v. 17, n. 66, p. 52, doi. 10.33392/diam.1478
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 17335566 AND DT 2020 AND VI 17 AND IP 66
Results: 5
1
2
THE PROBLEM OF NEW EVIDENCE: P-HACKING AND PRE-ANALYSIS PLANS.
- Published in:
- Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2020, v. 17, n. 66, p. 10, doi. 10.33392/diam.1587
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
MODEL BIOMEDYCZNY W PSYCHOPATOLOGII. KRYTYCZNY SZKIC HISTORYCZNY, WSPÓŁCZESNY KONTEKST I PROBLEMY ETYCZNE.
- Published in:
- Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2020, v. 17, n. 66, p. 34, doi. 10.33392/diam.1260
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
OLD TIMES' SAKE AS A MORAL CATEGORY.
- Published in:
- Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2020, v. 17, n. 66, p. 2, doi. 10.33392/diam.1462
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
IS EPISTEMIC SAFETY THREATENED BY FRANKFURT CASES? A REPLY TO KELP.
- Published in:
- Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2020, v. 17, n. 66, p. 66, doi. 10.33392/diam.1448
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article