Works matching IS 15595749 AND DT 2012 AND VI 7 AND IP 1/2
1
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 98, doi. 10.18061/1811/52987
- Article
2
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 95, doi. 10.18061/1811/52986
- Article
3
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 88, doi. 10.18061/1811/52985
- Article
4
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 85, doi. 10.18061/1811/52984
- Article
5
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 80, doi. 10.18061/1811/52983
- Article
6
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 69, doi. 10.18061/1811/52982
- Article
7
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 63, doi. 10.18061/1811/52981
- Article
8
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 57, doi. 10.18061/1811/52980
- Article
9
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 49, doi. 10.18061/1811/52979
- Article
10
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 45, doi. 10.18061/1811/52978
- Article
11
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 36, doi. 10.18061/1811/52977
- Article
12
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 28, doi. 10.18061/1811/52976
- Article
13
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 17, doi. 10.18061/1811/52975
- Article
14
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 12, doi. 10.18061/1811/52974
- Article
15
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 5, doi. 10.18061/1811/52973
- Article
16
- Empirical Musicology Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 1/2, p. 2, doi. 10.18061/1811/52972
- Article