HOW MUCH SHOULD THE PEOPLE KNOW? IMPLICATIONS OF METHODOLOGICAL CHOICES IN THE STUDY OF INTENTIONALITY AND BLAME ASCRIPTIONS.
- Published in:
- Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 15503550 AND DT 2016 AND VI 12 AND IP 2
Results: 5
1
2
THE WEAPON FOCUS EFFECT: TESTING AN EXTENSION OF THE UNUSUALNESS HYPOTHESIS.
- Published in:
- Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
LOOKING BAD: INFERRING CRIMINALITY AFTER 100 MILLISECONDS.
- Published in:
- Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 114
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
IN DEFENSE OF "COP SHOP" PEDAGOGY.
- Published in:
- Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 126
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: IDENTIFICATION AND RESPONSE TO NEUROLOGICAL TRAUMA.
- Published in:
- Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 71
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article