FLORENCE V. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS: THE SUPREME COURT'S SECOND CHANCE TO CLARIFY STRIP SEARCHES IN DETENTION FACILITIES.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 721By:Tsung-chia Chad LiPublication type:Article
CLOSING DIRECT APPEAL TO INEFFECTIVENESS CLAIMS: THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA'S DENIAL OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 687By:Place, Thomas M.Publication type:Article
PATHS OF WESTERN LAW AFTER JUSTINIAN.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 757By:Madden, M. StuartPublication type:Article
REASSESSING CORPORATE PERSONHOOD IN THE WAKE OF OCCUPY WALL STREET.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 611By:Sciullo, Nick J.Publication type:Article
SANDUSKY'S VICTIMS: COMPENSATION, VINDICATION, AND BLAME.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 589By:Culhane, John G.Publication type:Article
CAN THE NCAA ENFORCEMENT PROCESS PROTECT CHILDREN FROM ABUSE IN THE WAKE OF THE SANDUSKY SCANDAL?Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 555By:Porto, Brian L.Publication type:Article
SYMPOSIUM THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE SANDUSKY SCANDAL.Published in:Widener Law Journal, 2013, v. 22, n. 3, p. 551By:Glenn, Caitlin E.Publication type:Article