SCHEDULED SKYPING WITH MOM OR DAD: COMMUNICATIVE TECHNOLOGY'S IMPACT ON CALIFORNIA FAMILY LAW.Published in:Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 142By:Spatz, Jenna CharlottePublication type:Article
IS DRIVING WITH THE INTENT TO GATHER NEWS A CRIME? THE CHILLING EFFECTS OF CALIFORNIA'S ANTI-PAPARAZZI LEGISLATION.Published in:Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 82By:Locke, Christina M.;Murrhee, Kara CarnleyPublication type:Article
VIACOM V. YOUTUBE: AN ERRONEOUS RULING BASED ON THE OUTMODED DMCA.Published in:Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 100By:Katz, LiorPublication type:Article
THESE TATS ARE MADE FOR TALKING: WHY TATTOOS AND TATTOOING ARE PROTECTED SPEECH UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT.Published in:Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 174By:Strocker, CarlyPublication type:Article