BARRIERS TO REUNIFICATION FOR INCARCERATED PARENTS-A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01429.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 15312445 AND DT 2012 AND VI 50 AND IP 1
Results: 18
1
2
A TRIBUTE TO JEANNE T. AMES.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01420.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
SERVICES FOR CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01431.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
A REVIEW OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO PREPARE PARENTS FOR CUSTODY AND VISITATION MEDIATION.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 128, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01434.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
FAMILY DRUG TREATMENT COURTS AND SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH<sup>1</sup>.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 137, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01435.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
FATHERHOOD IN THE CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM: AN INNOVATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH TO AN OLD PROBLEM<sup>1</sup>.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01428.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
MATERNAL SEPARATIONS DURING THE REENTRY YEARS FOR 100 INFANTS RAISED IN A PRISON NURSERY.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01430.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHY WE DO WHAT WE DO-A FAMILY COURT REFLECTION.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 8, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01423.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
SKEPTICISM BORDERING ON DISTRUST: FAMILY LAW IN THE HOLLYWOOD CINEMA.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01424.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
WHEN THE COST IS TOO GREAT: THE EMOTIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT ON CHILDREN OF INCARCERATING THEIR PARENTS FOR DRUG OFFENCES<sup>1</sup>.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 48, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01427.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
PUBLICATION UPDATE.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01422.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
REENTRY COURTS: PROVIDING A SECOND CHANCE FOR INCARCERATED MOTHERS AND THEIR CHILDREN.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 113, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01433.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
MOVING BEYOND GENERALIZATIONS AND STEREOTYPES TO DEVELOP INDIVIDUALIZED APPROACHES FOR WORKING WITH FAMILIES AFFECTED BY PARENTAL INCARCERATION.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 36, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01426.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
JANUARY 2012.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01421.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS FOR SECONDARY GIRLS OF INCARCERATED PARENTS.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 106, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01432.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
SPECIAL ISSUE: MAKING A BETTER WORLD FOR CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01425.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
ASSESSING DANGER: WHAT JUDGES NEED TO KNOW.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 150, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01436.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
MIS-MATCHED: TAKING A STATE APPROACH TO ENFORCING THE GROWING INTERNATIONAL MATCHMAKING INDUSTRY.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 159, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01437.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article