Works matching IS 14708396 AND DT 2016 AND VI 15 AND IP 1
Results: 7
Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Rejoinder.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv008
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Uncertainty and LR: to integrate or not to integrate, that's the question.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Quantifying the presumption of innocence.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comment on 'Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty on the assessment of a likelihood ratio' by Taroni F., Bozza S., Biederman A. and Aitken C.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 17, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Case comment-Briscoe v. City of New Haven: a statistical analysis of the effect of different written/oral exam weightings in disparate impact claims.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2016, v. 15, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgv019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article