Works matching IS 14708396 AND DT 2012 AND VI 11 AND IP 4
Results: 13
Reply to Hamer: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 361, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs022
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A short reply on the discussion by D. Hamer.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 371, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs025
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Traditional conclusions in footwear examinations versus the use of the Bayesian approach and likelihood ratio: a review of a recent UK appellate court decision.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 279, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
How clear is transparent? Reporting expert reasoning in legal cases.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 317, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Discussion paper: A just measure of probability.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 365, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs023
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
An introduction to a debate.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 255, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Discussion paper: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 331, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Discussion paper: Reaction to Hamer and Thompson in LPR.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 373, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A Final Comment.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 289, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Discussion paper: Hard cases make bad law—reactions to R v T.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 347, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The likelihood ratio as value of evidence—more than a question of numbers.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 303, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: an analysis and discussion in the light of R v T.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 259, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article