Works matching IS 14708396 AND DT 2006 AND VI 5 AND IP 2
Results: 5
Negative conclusion cases: further proposal for likelihood ratio evaluation.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 119, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgl018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Case comment—United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): quantification of the ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’ standard.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 159, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgl017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comment on the meaning of ‘proof beyond a reasonable doubt’.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 167, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgl016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Case comment—United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): A Collateral Attack on the Legal Maxim That Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Is Unquantifiable?
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 135, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgl015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A scenario-driven decision support system for serious crime investigation.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 87, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgl014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article