Works matching IS 10976736 AND DT 1996
1
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 99
- Article
2
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 89, doi. 10.1002/ev.1051
- Article
3
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 81, doi. 10.1002/ev.1050
- Lamberti, Mary Jo;
- Katzenmeyer, Conrad
- Article
4
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 61, doi. 10.1002/ev.1049
- Article
5
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 49
- Article
6
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 39
- Article
7
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 81
- Article
8
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 25
- Article
9
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 63
- Couper, Mick P.;
- Groves, Robert M.
- Article
10
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 71, p. 7
- Article
11
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 72, p. 5
- Article
12
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 71, p. 15
- Article
13
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 45
- Dillman, Don A.;
- Sangster, Roberta L.
- Article
14
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 71, p. 61
- Article
15
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 71, p. 51
- Article
16
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 71, p. 29
- Pollitt, Christopher;
- Summa, Hilkka
- Article
17
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 93
- McKay, Ruth B.;
- Breslow, Martha J.
- Article
18
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 29
- Krosnick, Jon A.;
- Narayan, Sowmya
- Article
19
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 3
- Article
20
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 69, p. 85
- Article
21
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 70, p. 17, doi. 10.1002/ev.1032
- Article
22
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 69, p. 51
- Wagner, Mary M.;
- Gomby, Deanna S.
- Article
23
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 69, p. 69
- Garnett, Donna M.;
- Gould, Marsha S.
- Article
24
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 69, p. 35
- Roberts, Richard N.;
- Wasik, Barbara H.
- Article
25
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 69, p. 21
- Article
26
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, n. 69, p. 5
- Article