"BUT IT'S MY HOUSE TOO": HUD'S FAILURE TO INCLUDE STATUTORILY REQUIRED PROTECTIONS FOR NON-BORROWING SPOUSES IN REVERSE MORTGAGE REGULATIONS.Published in:Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 94By:ROBERTSON, RENÉ L.Publication type:Article
THE TRUST-AS-WILL PORTMANTEAU: TRILL OR SPORK?Published in:Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 40By:SCHENKEL, KENT D.Publication type:Article
OPINION OF THE IDAHO PROBATE COURT IN RE: THE ESTATE OF RONALD H. VICTOR.Published in:Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 11By:Kershaw Jr., Thomas D.Publication type:Article
OPINION OF THE CONNECTICUT PROBATE COURT IN RE: THE CONSERVED, AN INCAPACITATED INDIVIDUAL.Published in:Quinnipiac Probate Law Journal, 2013, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1By:Keyes, John A.Publication type:Article