INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND EXCLUSIVE (SUBJECT MATTER) JURISDICTION: BETWEEN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW.Published in:Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 2, p. 357By:UBERTAZZI, BENEDETTAPublication type:Article
Medimmune v. Genentech: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Supreme Court's Continued Assault on the Patentee.Published in:Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 2, p. 503By:SMITH, NICHOLAS G.Publication type:Article
Balancing Acts: Using a Mixed Test to Ensure Better Results in Rule of Reason Patent Misuse Analysis within Section 337.Published in:2011By:SHELBOURNE, SYVILPublication type:Opinion
ACTA Fool or: How Rights Holders Learned to Stop Worrying and Love 512's Subpoena Provisions.Published in:Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 2, p. 465By:SHANAHAN, COLIN E.Publication type:Article
THE FOURTEENTH ANNUAL HONORABLE HELEN WILSON NIES MEMORIAL LECTURE IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: CAN THE PATENT OFFICE BE FIXED?Published in:Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 2, p. 295By:Lemley, Mark A.Publication type:Article
Using Intellectual Property to Secure Financing after the Worst Financial Crisis Since the Great Depression.Published in:2011By:JACOBS, BRIAN W.Publication type:Opinion
COERCION WILL NOT PROTECT TRADEMARK OWNERS IN CHINA,1 BUT AN UNDERSTANDING OF CHINA'S CULTURE WILL: A LESSON THE UNITED STATES HAS TO LEARN.Published in:Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 2, p. 325By:HOOVER, DALILAPublication type:Article
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLOQUIUM SERIES: CANADA AND THE THREE-STEP TEST: A STEP IN WHICH DIRECTION?Published in:2011By:GENDREAU, YSOLDEPublication type:Speech