THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE FOR THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND KERR.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
Works matching IS 10863818 AND DT 2009 AND VI 24 AND IP 3
Results: 9
1
2
DEFENDING THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND MURPHY.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
PRIVACY AND THE THIRD HAND: LESSONS FROM THE COMMON LAW OF REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1199
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
PEEPING.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
ARE ''BETTER'' SECURITY BREACH NOTIFICATION LAWS POSSIBLE?
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1133
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
FEDERAL SECURITY BREACH NOTIFICATIONS: POLITICS AND APPROACHES.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
PRIVACY COSTS AND PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION: ECONOMIC AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVES.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
GOVERNMENT DATA BREACHES.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
HOW A BILL BECOMES A LAW, REALLY.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1009
- Publication type:
- Article