Works matching IS 10738606 AND DT 2022 AND VI 40 AND IP 3
Results: 4
BURGER KING HAD IT THEIR WAY: WHY THE SINGLE-ENTITY DEFENSE SHOULD PROPERLY DEFEAT CLAIMS OF FEDERAL ANTITRUST CONSPIRACY ARISING OUT OF NO-POACH AGREEMENTS BETWEEN FRANCHISORS AND FRANCHISEES.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2022, v. 40, n. 3, p. 463
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
YOU CAN CHECK-IN ANY TIME YOU LIKE, BUT YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE: FORCED MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT AND ADVANCE DIRECTIVES.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2022, v. 40, n. 3, p. 395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE AMENDABILITY PARADOX: COULD AN UNAMENDABLE AMENDMENT BE AMENDED?
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2022, v. 40, n. 3, p. 379
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
BEYOND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: HIGHER EDUCATION'S NEED FOR PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS TO MUTE SOCIAL MEDIA OUTRAGE.
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2022, v. 40, n. 3, p. 327
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article