LONELINESS IN THE CROWD: WHY NOBODY WANTS OPT-OUT CLASS MEMBERS TO ASSERT OFFENSIVE ISSUE PRECLUSION AGAINST CLASS DEFENDANTS.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 10661271 AND DT 2013 AND VI 66 AND IP 1
Results: 7
1
2
THE PARADOX OF LEGAL EQUIVALENTS AND SCIENTIFIC EQUIVALENCE: RECONCILING PATENT LAW'S DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS WITH THE FDA'S BLOEQUIVALENCE REQUIREMENT.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE IMMIGRANT AND MIRANDA.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 277
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
FRIEND OR FOE? THE SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE IN POST-CONVICTION FORMAL REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 227
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
AGAINST NEOREHABILITATION.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 189
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
TECHNOLOGICAL INTERMEDIARIES AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 157
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
SEXTING: 21ST-CENTURY STATUTORY RAPE.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 111
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article