EXCESSIVELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL: CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE AND THE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE IN VIRGINIA.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1393
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 10658254 AND DT 2017 AND VI 25 AND IP 4
Results: 6
1
2
COMBATING THIEVES OF VALOR: THE STOLEN VALOR ACT OF 2013 IS CONSTITUTIONAL YET UNENFORCED.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1355
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
"TIME ENOUGH" FOR SCRUTINY: THE SECOND AMENDMENT, MENTAL HEALTH, AND THE CASE FOR INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1325
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
SEMANTIC VAGUENESS AND EXTRAJUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONMAKING.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
THE GOVERNMENT SPEECH DOCTRINE IN WALKER'S WAKE: EARLY RIFTS AND REVERBERATIONS ON FREE SPEECH, VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION, AND OFFENSIVE EXPRESSION.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
HIDING IN PLAIN VIEW: A PATH AROUND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FOR STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 4, p. 1179
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article