BLAKELY, APPRENDI, BOOKER, BEGAY, AND SANTOS: JUDICIAL MINIMALISM AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S ILL-CONCEIVED ATTEMPTS AT A RATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE.Published in:St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 87By:Yera, E. J.Publication type:Article
BIG BILL HAYWOOD'S REVENGE: THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.Published in:St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35By:Hirsch, MiltonPublication type:Article
FOREWORD: CRIMINAL LAW ISSUE.Published in:St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1Publication type:Article
DEATH IS DIFFERENT: THE NEED FOR JURY UNANIMITY IN DEATH PENALTY CASES.Published in:St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 4By:Cantero, Raoul G.;Kline, Robert M.Publication type:Article
THE BANALITY OF EXCESSIVE DEFENDER WORKLOAD: MANAGING THE SYSTEMIC OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.Published in:St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 104By:Brummer, Bennett H.Publication type:Article