Moral Hypocrisy or Intellectual Inconsistency? A Historical Perspective on Our Habit of Placing Male and Female Genital Cutting in Separate Ethical Boxes.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
Works matching IS 10546863 AND DT 2016 AND VI 26 AND IP 2
Results: 7
1
2
Between Moral Relativism and Moral Hypocrisy: Reframing the Debate on "FGM".
- Published in:
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. 105, doi. 10.1353/ken.2016.0009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Nonegalitarian Social Responsibility for Health: A Confucian Perspective on Article 14 of the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
4
On Physician-Industry Relationships and Unreasonable Standards of Proof for Harm: A Population-Level Bioethics Approach.
- Published in:
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. 173, doi. 10.1353/ken.2016.0022
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Relativists and Hypocrites: Earp on Genital Cutting.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
6
Equality Now in Genital Reshaping: Brian Earp's Search for Moral Consistency.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
7
Editorial Note.
- Published in:
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. vii, doi. 10.1353/ken.2016.0012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article