Using the Supreme Court's Original Habeas Jurisdiction to "Ma[k]e" New Rules Retroactive.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
Works matching IS 10539867 AND DT 2016 AND VI 28 AND IP 3
Results: 19
1
2
Taking a Closer Look: A Case for Sentencing Reform.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.221
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Sentencing Reform: Let's Keep What We Know Works and Avoid What We Know Fails.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 219, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Quick Facts: Mandatory Minimum Penalties.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.217
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2014.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 211, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.211
- Publication type:
- Article
6
A Commentary on Judicial Discretion, Mandatory Minimums, and Sentencing Reform.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
7
The Debate Continues.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 206, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.206
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Response to Paul Hofer.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Letter to the Editor
9
Review of DOJ-Commissioned Report: Racial Disparity in Post-Booker Sentencing.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 196, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.196
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Federal Sentencing Disparity: 2005-2012 (Summary).
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.195
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Decision, United States v. Pruitt.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 184, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.184
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Letter to Judge Patti B. Saris, Revised Statement of Reasons.
- Published in:
- 2016
- Publication type:
- Letter
13
The Importance of Statements of Reasons in Guideline Sentencing.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 174, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.174
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
The Evolution of the Statement of Reasons Form.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 169, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.169
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Special Notes--Criminal--Practice Guidelines.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 168, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.168
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Foreword to Judge Arthur Tarnow's Special Notes.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 167, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Judicial Discretion in Federal Sentencing--Real or Imagined?
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 165, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.165
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The Discretion to Sentence.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 161, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.161
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
A Booker Effect?
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 155, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.155
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article