AEDPA Mea Culpa.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
Works matching IS 10539867 AND DT 2012 AND VI 24 AND IP 4
Results: 16
1
2
Heeding Congress's Message: The United States Supreme Court Bars Federal Courthouse Doors to Habeas Relief Against All but Irrational State Court Decisions, and Oftentimes Doubly So.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 320, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.321
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Non-Capital Habeas Cases after Appellate Review: An Empirical Analysis.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 308, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.308
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Unlocking the Courthouse Door: Removing the Barrier of the PLRA's Physical Injury Requirement to Permit Meaningful Judicial Oversight of Abuses in Supermax Prisons and Isolation Units.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 268, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.268
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
State Post-Conviction Remedies in the Next Fifteen Years: How Synergy Between the State and Federal Governments Can Improve the Criminal Justice System Nationally.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 298, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.298
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Why Habeas Review of State Court Convictions Is More Important than Ever.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 292, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.292
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Exhausted.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 287, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.287
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
The Prison Litigation Reform Act as Sex Legislation: (Imagining) a Punk's Perspective of the Act.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 276, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.276
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Innocence and Federal Habeas after AEDPA: Time for the Supreme Court to Act.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
10
Prison Reform Litigation Acts.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 263, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.263
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The Prison Litigation Reform Act: A Threat to Civil Rights.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 260, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.260
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Forms of Deference in Prison Law.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
13
The Need for Independent Prison Oversight in a Post-PLRA World.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 236, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.236
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Isn't It Ironic? The "Particular Plaintiffs" Provision of the PLRA.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 229, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Not So Sweet: Questions Raised by Sixteen Years of the PLRA and AEDPA.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
16
EDITORS' NOTES.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 223
- Publication type:
- Article