Editor's perspective: COVID‐19's impact on the remediation industry.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 3, doi. 10.1002/rem.21655
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 10515658 AND DT 2020 AND VI 30 AND IP 3
Results: 9
1
2
Evaluation of PFAS treatment technology: Alkaline ozonation.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 27, doi. 10.1002/rem.21654
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Six pilot‐scale studies evaluating the in situ treatment of PFAS in groundwater.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 39, doi. 10.1002/rem.21653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
A case study of methomyl removal from aqueous solutions by four natural Albanian clays.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 89, doi. 10.1002/rem.21648
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Determination of suitable TPH remediation approach via MANOVA and inferential statistics assessment.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 75, doi. 10.1002/rem.21647
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Vapor intrusion risk evaluation using automated continuous chemical and physical parameter monitoring.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 65, doi. 10.1002/rem.21646
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Comparing PFAS to other groundwater contaminants: Implications for remediation.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 7, doi. 10.1002/rem.21645
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Stratigraphic flux—A method for determining preferential pathways for complex sites.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 51, doi. 10.1002/rem.21644
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Issue Information.
- Published in:
- Remediation Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/rem.21597
- Publication type:
- Article