Works matching IS 09694900 AND DT 2012 AND VI 20 AND IP 8
1
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 603, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.603
- Article
2
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 601, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.601
- Article
3
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 599, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.599
- Article
4
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 594, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.594
- Article
5
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 588, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.588
- Article
6
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 582, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.582
- Article
7
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 576, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.576
- Article
8
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 566, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.566
- Article
9
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 558, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.558
- Article
10
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 552, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.552
- Stohl, Hindi;
- Chen, Judy;
- Jaque, Jenny
- Article
11
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 546, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.546
- Clarke, Paula;
- Simms, Mabel
- Article
12
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 540, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.540
- Article
13
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2012, v. 20, n. 8, p. 538, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.8.538
- Article