Works matching IS 09694900 AND DT 2007 AND VI 15 AND IP 9
7
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 589
- Article
10
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 582
- Article
12
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 579, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27124
- Article
13
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 552, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27126
- Article
14
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 578, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27125
- Article
15
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 576, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27123
- Article
17
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 562, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27127
- Article
18
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 556, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27119
- Porter, Jan;
- Meddings, Fiona
- Article
19
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 577, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27120
- Article
20
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 545, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27128
- Article
21
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 540, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27216
- Article
22
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 536, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27122
- Article
23
- British Journal of Midwifery, 2007, v. 15, n. 9, p. 534, doi. 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.9.27215
- Article