KINSHIP: BORN AND BRED (BUT ALSO FACILITATED)? A COMMENTARY ON ‘DONOR CONCEPTION: ETHICAL ASPECTS OF INFORMATION SHARING’ (NUFFIELD COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, LONDON 2013).Published in:2014By:Murphy, Thérèse;Turkmendag, IlkePublication type:Opinion
Res Ipsa Loquitur & Medical Negligence: A Comparative Survey.Published in:2014By:Wheeler, RobertPublication type:Book Review
Bioethics, Medicine and the Criminal Law Volume 1, The Criminal Law and Bioethical Conflict: Walking the Tightrope.Published in:2014By:Heywood, RobPublication type:Book Review
THE SCOPE OF THE CONSCIENCE-BASED EXEMPTION IN SECTION 4(1) OF THE ABORTION ACT 1967: DOOGAN AND WOOD V NHS GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD [2013] CSIH 36.Published in:2014By:Neal, MaryPublication type:Opinion
MATER SEMPER INCERTUS EST: WHO'S YOUR MUMMY?Published in:Medical Law Review, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 357, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/fwt047By:D'alton-Harrison, RitaPublication type:Article
NUMERICAL LIMITS IN DONOR CONCEPTION REGIMES: GENETIC LINKS AND ‘EXTENDED FAMILY’ IN THE ERA OF IDENTITY DISCLOSURE.Published in:Medical Law Review, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 325, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/fwt044By:Millbank, JenniPublication type:Article
Law, Ethics and Compromise at the Limits of Life: to Treat or not to Treat?Published in:2014By:Foster, CharlesPublication type:Book Review
OF PARADOX AND PLAUSIBILITY: THE DYNAMIC OF CHANGE IN MEDICAL LAW.Published in:Medical Law Review, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 305, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/fwt036By:Harrington, JohnPublication type:Article
‘IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT?’: SCANDALS, ‘RISK’, AND COSMETIC SURGERY REGULATION IN THE UK AND FRANCE.Published in:Medical Law Review, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 384, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/fwt033By:Latham, MelaniePublication type:Article