Special issue: domestic partnerships: stretching the marriage model?
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 141, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9024-z
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 09663622 AND DT 2006 AND VI 14 AND IP 2
Results: 7
1
2
Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project.
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 145, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9025-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Losing the Feminist Voice? Debates on The Legal Recognition of Same Sex Partnerships in Canada.
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 213, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9028-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Cohabitation Law Reform – Messages From Research.
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 167, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9026-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Case note: Same-sex Marriage in South Africa –the constitutional Court's Judgment.
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 261, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9030-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Sex and the civil partnership act: the future of (non) conjugality?
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 241, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9029-7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
From Mrs. Burns To Mrs. Oxley: Do Co-habiting Women (Still) Need Marriage Law?
- Published in:
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 181, doi. 10.1007/s10691-006-9027-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article