Measuring the influence of nanotechnology environmental, health and safety research.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 389, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13204064891897
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 09582029 AND DT 2011 AND VI 20 AND IP 5
Results: 7
1
2
Mobility, productivity, gender and career development of Argentinean life scientists.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 411, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13176484436177
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Categorizing h-index variants.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 397, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13176484436131
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Perceptions and actions: relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 377, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13176484436014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 365, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13164389670392
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Farewell Beech Tree, hello Oxford University Press.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 351, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13204064891932
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
What are the key indicators for evaluating the activities of universities?
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2011, v. 20, n. 5, p. 353, doi. 10.3152/095820211X13176484436096
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article