Afterword: the emergent literature on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research evaluation.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 09582029 AND DT 2006 AND VI 15 AND IP 1
Results: 8
1
2
Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 57, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776048
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776039
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776066
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria: issues in assessing interdisciplinary research.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776057
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2006, v. 15, n. 1, p. 17, doi. 10.3152/147154406781776075
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article