Weak benchmarking indicators for formative and semi-evaluative assessment of research.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 63, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776518
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 09582029 AND DT 2004 AND VI 13 AND IP 1
Results: 7
1
2
Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776563
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Bibliometric analysis of presence and impact of ethnic minority researchers on science in the UK.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776545
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776536
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The evaluation of social relevance in an environmental research programme.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776527
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations.
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776509
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Intraorganisational evaluation: are there 'least evaluable units'?
- Published in:
- Research Evaluation, 2004, v. 13, n. 1, p. 19, doi. 10.3152/147154404781776554
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article