Methodological Clarity or the Substantial Purity of Law? Notes on the Discussion between Kelsen and Pitamic.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 176, doi. 10.1111/raju.12045
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 09521917 AND DT 2014 AND VI 27 AND IP 2
Results: 8
1
2
The Subjects of Collectively Binding Decisions: Democratic Inclusion and Extraterritorial Law.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 252, doi. 10.1111/raju.12038
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
On the Nature of Norms.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1111/raju.12040
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Positivism, Legal Validity, and the Separation of Law and Morals.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 190, doi. 10.1111/raju.12044
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Rhetoric Meets Rational Argumentation Theory.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 236, doi. 10.1111/raju.12043
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
A Typological Reading of Prevailing Legal Theories.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 218, doi. 10.1111/raju.12042
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Why Reflective Equilibrium? II: Following Up on Rawls's Comparison of His Own Approach with a Kantian Approach.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 288, doi. 10.1111/raju.12039
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Virtuous Circularity: Positive Law and Particular Justice.
- Published in:
- Ratio Juris, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 271, doi. 10.1111/raju.12041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article