Representing the Structure of a Debate.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 595, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09586-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 0920427X AND DT 2022 AND VI 36 AND IP 4
Results: 7
1
2
Primatologists and Philosophers Debate on the Question of the Origin of Morality: A Dialectical Analysis of Philosophical Argumentation Strategies and the Pitfalls of Cross-Disciplinary Disagreement.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 511, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09585-3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 541, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09584-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 493, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09583-5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy: In memory of Prof. Marcelo Dascal.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 481, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09582-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 455, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09581-7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919).
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2022, v. 36, n. 4, p. 569, doi. 10.1007/s10503-022-09580-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article