Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2016, v. 30, n. 3, p. 221, doi. 10.1007/s10503-015-9370-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 0920427X AND DT 2016 AND VI 30 AND IP 3
Results: 8
1
2
Logically Incorrect Arguments.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2016, v. 30, n. 3, p. 263, doi. 10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
4
Proof and Dialogue in Aristotle.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2016, v. 30, n. 3, p. 289, doi. 10.1007/s10503-015-9382-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Else Barth (1928-2015).
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Report
6
Why Simpler Arguments are Better.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2016, v. 30, n. 3, p. 247, doi. 10.1007/s10503-015-9367-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Some Artificial Intelligence Tools for Argument Evaluation: An Introduction.
- Published in:
- Argumentation, 2016, v. 30, n. 3, p. 317, doi. 10.1007/s10503-015-9387-x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Harald R. Wohlrapp: The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation. Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning 4.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review