COMPLYING WITH THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: GUIDANCE FOR COURTS AND LEGISLATURES CONSIDERING VIDEOCONFERENCE-TESTIMONY PROVISIONS.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 149By:Weber, Francis A.Publication type:Article
IS INJUSTICE RELEVANT? NARRATIVE AND BLAMEWORTHINESS IN PROTESTER TRIALS.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 107By:West, Jessica L.Publication type:Article
AS THOUGH THEY ARE CHILDREN: REPLACING MANDATORY MINIMUMS WITH INDIVIDUALIZED SENTENCING DETERMINATIONS FOR JUVENILES IN PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL COURT AFTER MILLER V. ALABAMA.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 215By:Frumin Eisenberg, RachaelPublication type:Article
EMINENT DOMAIN: A SOLUTION TO THE MORTGAGE CRISIS?Published in:Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 181By:Perry, Alexandra M.Publication type:Article
THE NORMATIVE LEGITIMACY OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 61By:Grossman, NienkePublication type:Article
IS THE PRESIDENT'S RECOGNITION POWER EXCLUSIVE?Published in:Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 1By:Reinstein, Robert J.Publication type:Article